Blog

Hispanic Values are Conservative Values 

A common misconception often shared in various new outlets, social media circles and by common folk that Hispanics who are U.S born and Hispanic immigrants as a “group” are “monolithic” and lean heavily towards progressive values.

I was able to interview immigrants from Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico, Guatemala & Cuba (HEMGC). Most were first generation immigrants, but some were naturalized U.S. citizens.

Based on these interviews and discussions, typical Hispanic immigrants from these countries are more aligned with conservative values and practices.  Hispanic immigrant values are conservative values. Liberal and progressive policies when compared to the questions posed run contrary to all responses provided by the immigrants who participated.

Those interviewed were asked a consistent base of questions that focused on how government in their countries of origin and how social service networks function. In addition, we asked about their social norms around marriage, abortion and overall values and approaches to work, taxation and property rights. We limited some responses in other areas of social services for the sake of brevity.

Participants ranged in ages from 25-55, male and female, married and single, with and without children. The responses were enlightening to say the least, but consistent with common perceptions that align with their religious values and beliefs. As a general rule, governmental social service systems in HEMGC countries are virtually non-existent.

When discussing the social service safety net and comparing that to what we have in the U.S. like SNAP, EBT, welfare, Medicaid and section 8 housing subsidies, for the most part these options do not exist in the countries we looked at. Only in extreme cases can families obtain some food assistance. The funds available to provide families this basic support is limited due to lack of funds and corruption. The corruption found in these countries is usually the diversion of funds from social service programs for personal use by government officials. In the U.S. our taxation system funds many of these programs. In HEMGC countries, some have payroll tax systems, but its self-reported by employers and not mandated to be withheld from employee paychecks as is found in the U.S. Enforcement for not submitting taxes to the government is weak. Assuming HEMGC systems for payroll taxes and other tax collection programs (sales tax) were tightened and paid by businesses, the likelihood of corruption is so high that funds will not get to the right programs anyway.

In regards to property rights, the HEMGC countries have democratically elected governments and property rights are respected. Their approach to property ownership is similar to the U.S., homes are purchased outright, or with traditional bank financing. Deeds are transferred to the owners once the loans have been satisfied.  The seizure of land and homes is non-existent, unless mortgages have not been paid.

In HEMGC countries, if families can’t work, they don’t eat. If they don’t work, they can’t pay for housing and may become homeless. These immigrants have a strong work ethic, due to their need to survive on what they earn, and not government handouts. As evidenced by the survey, they also look down on those who try to get government support, hard as it may be, when they are physically able to work. Laziness and not working is frowned upon.
The family unit in these countries is made up of a man and a woman. Mom and dad, heterosexuality is the norm in the family unit. Some may be married, but some may not be. It’s not uncommon in some countries like Honduras, for couples not to get married. I heard as high as 80% of families may not be “legally” married. It’s also not uncommon for the family unit to have multiple children, due to not practicing typical birth control methods.

In HEMGC countries, the family unit still practices old fashioned family values where the dad goes to work and the mom takes care of multiple kids and the home. Same sex relationships are taboo, are frowned upon and not common. Identifying oneself as openly gay is also taboo. Transsexualism is not accepted. Traditional marriages (man & woman) and typical heterosexual values are the norm and practiced. This is supported by those who were surveyed that they support biblical Christianity, Catholic values and church attendance, along with conservative teachings of the church.
When those who were surveyed were pressed on the acceptance of non-traditional marriages, gay relationships and gender fluidity, these terms and lifestyles are not accepted in these HEMGC countries. Although, some shared they will look the other way and will ignore it. Those that do practice these alternative lifestyles are outside of social and cultural norms. It is not expected that the rest of society approve of, or accept these lifestyles.

With regards to how these Hispanic cultures in HEMGC countries see the issue of abortion, they are strictly against it. They believe God has the final say in life and death. When discussing issues of faith, the respondents shared their countries are predominately Catholic, with a fast growing evangelical population. Although, many not be as devout in their daily practices, when it comes to issues of traditional family units (unmarried couples), they align their overall social belief systems with biblical values.

Overall, first generation Hispanics surveyed from HEGMC countries, and those who became naturalized citizens are more closely aligned with conservative values, than progressive values. Traditional family units are strongly supported, as is hard work, rejecting public assistance, supporting heterosexual marriages and they are anti-abortion.

Special thanks to Lucia, Maria, Miquel, Rodolfo, Julio, Juanita  and many others who shared deeply personal stories that will serve as a foundation for other articles. Names were changed to respect their privacy.

Los Valores Hispanos son Valores Conservadores (Spanish)

Un concepto erróneo común a menudo compartido en varios medios nuevos, círculos de redes sociales y gente común de que los hispanos nacidos en los Estados Unidos y los inmigrantes hispanos como un “grupo” son “monolíticos” y se inclinan fuertemente hacia valores progresivos.

Pude entrevistar a inmigrantes de Honduras, El Salvador, México, Guatemala y Cuba (HEMGC). La mayoría eran inmigrantes de primera generación, pero algunos eran ciudadanos estadounidenses naturalizados.

Según estas entrevistas y debates, los inmigrantes hispanos típicos de estos países están más alineados con los valores y prácticas conservadores. Los valores de los inmigrantes hispanos son valores conservadores. Las políticas liberales y progresistas en comparación con las preguntas planteadas son contrarias a todas las respuestas proporcionadas por los inmigrantes que participaron.

A los entrevistados se les hizo una base consistente de preguntas que se centraron en cómo el gobierno en sus países de origen y cómo funcionan las redes de servicios sociales. Además, preguntamos acerca de sus normas sociales sobre el matrimonio, el aborto y los valores y enfoques generales del trabajo, los impuestos y los derechos de propiedad. Limitamos algunas respuestas en otras áreas de los servicios sociales en aras de la brevedad.
Los participantes tenían entre 25 y 55 años, hombres y mujeres, casados y solteros, con y sin hijos. Las respuestas fueron esclarecedoras por decir lo menos, pero consistentes con las percepciones comunes que se alinean con sus valores y creencias religiosas. Como regla general, los sistemas gubernamentales de servicios sociales en los países HEMGC son prácticamente inexistentes.

Cuando se discute la red de seguridad del servicio social y se compara con lo que tenemos en los EE. UU. Como SNAP, EBT, asistencia social, Medicaid y subsidios de vivienda de la sección 8, en su mayor parte, estas opciones no existen en los países que analizamos. Solo en casos extremos las familias pueden obtener asistencia alimentaria. Los fondos disponibles para proporcionar a las familias este apoyo básico son limitados debido a la falta de fondos y la corrupción. La corrupción que se encuentra en estos países suele ser el desvío de fondos de los programas de servicios sociales para uso personal de los funcionarios del gobierno.

En los EE. UU., Nuestro sistema tributario financia muchos de estos programas. En los países HEMGC, algunos tienen sistemas de impuestos sobre la nómina, pero los empleadores lo informan por sí mismos y no tienen la obligación de retenerlos de los cheques de pago de los empleados, como se encuentra en la Aplicación de los EE. UU. Por no presentar impuestos al gobierno es débil. Suponiendo que los sistemas HEMGC para los impuestos sobre la nómina y otros programas de recaudación de impuestos (impuesto sobre las ventas) fueron ajustados y pagados por las empresas, la probabilidad de corrupción es tan alta que los fondos no llegarán a los programas correctos de todos modos.

Con respecto a los derechos de propiedad, los países HEMGC tienen gobiernos elegidos democráticamente y se respetan los derechos de propiedad. Su enfoque de la propiedad es similar al de EE. UU., Las viviendas se compran directamente o con financiamiento bancario tradicional. Las escrituras se transfieren a los propietarios una vez que se han satisfecho los préstamos. La incautación de tierras y viviendas es inexistente, a menos que no se hayan pagado las hipotecas.

En los países HEMGC, si las familias no pueden trabajar, no comen. Si no trabajan, no pueden pagar la vivienda y pueden quedar sin hogar. Estos inmigrantes tienen una fuerte ética de trabajo, debido a su necesidad de sobrevivir con lo que ganan, y no de las dádivas gubernamentales. Como lo demuestra la encuesta, también desprecian a aquellos que intentan obtener el apoyo del gobierno, por muy difícil que sea, cuando son físicamente capaces de trabajar. La pereza y no trabajar está mal visto.

La unidad familiar en estos países está compuesta por un hombre y una mujer. Mamá y papá, la heterosexualidad es la norma en la unidad familiar. Algunos pueden estar casados, pero otros no. No es raro en algunos países como Honduras, que las parejas no se casen. Escuché que hasta el 80% de las familias pueden no estar casadas “legalmente”. Tampoco es raro que la unidad familiar tenga varios hijos, debido a que no practican métodos anticonceptivos típicos.

En los países HEMGC, la unidad familiar todavía practica los valores familiares anticuados donde el padre va a trabajar y la madre cuida a varios niños y al hogar. Las relaciones entre personas del mismo sexo son tabú, están mal vistas y no son comunes. Identificarse como abiertamente gay también es un tabú. La transexualidad no es aceptada. Los matrimonios tradicionales (hombre y mujer) y los valores heterosexuales típicos son la norma y se practican. Esto es apoyado por aquellos encuestados que apoyan el cristianismo bíblico, los valores católicos y la asistencia a la iglesia, junto con las enseñanzas conservadoras de la iglesia.

Cuando los encuestados fueron presionados sobre la aceptación de los matrimonios no tradicionales, las relaciones homosexuales y la fluidez de género, estos términos y estilos de vida no son aceptados en estos países HEMGC. Aunque, algunos compartieron que mirarán para otro lado y lo ignorarán. Aquellos que practican estos estilos de vida alternativos están fuera de las normas sociales y culturales. No se espera que el resto de la sociedad apruebe o acepte estos estilos de vida.

Con respecto a cómo la gente de cultura Hispana en los países HEMGC ven el tema del aborto, están estrictamente en contra. Creen que Dios tiene la última palabra en la vida y la muerte. Al discutir temas de fe, los encuestados compartieron que sus países son predominantemente católicos, con una población evangélica en rápido crecimiento. Aunque, muchos no son tan devotos en sus prácticas diarias, cuando se trata de cuestiones de unidades familiares tradicionales (parejas no casadas), alinean sus sistemas generales de creencias sociales con los valores bíblicos.

En general, los Hispanos de primera generación encuestados de países HEGMC, y aquellos que se convirtieron en ciudadanos naturalizados están más estrechamente alineados con los valores conservadores que con los valores progresivos. Las unidades familiares tradicionales reciben un fuerte apoyo, al igual que el trabajo duro, rechazan la asistencia pública, apoyan los matrimonios heterosexuales y son antiaborto.

Un agradecimiento especial a Lucía, María, Miquel, Rodolfo, Julio, Juanita y muchos otros que compartieron historias profundamente personales que servirán de base para otros artículos. Los nombres fueron cambiados para respetar su privacidad.

Civil Disobedience & Protesting

The charred wreckage of a beauty supply store destroyed during last week’s rioting which was sparked by the death of George Floyd on June 3, 2020 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. – Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who kneeled on the neck of George Floyd who later died, will now be charged with second-degree murder, and his three colleagues will face charges of aiding and abetting second-degree murder, court documents revealed on June 3. (Photo by kerem yucel / AFP) (Photo by KEREM YUCEL/AFP via Getty Images)

These thoughts are being written at a time when our country is deeply divided along racial and political lines as a result of multiple deaths of black men at the hands of police officers, over the course of a few years.

 We’re also in the midst of pandemic that seems to be abating at this time, but has led millions to lose their jobs. Some states have imposed draconian measures and mandatory home confinements that impede on our freedoms. The closing of thousands of business has impacted the livelihoods of business owners and employees.  Couple this with the fear of getting sick, the fear of law enforcement, the devaluing of human life, in conjunction with restricting our rights in general throughout the US, we are a pressure cooker ready to explode. The deaths of black men at the hands of law enforcement, some justified, some not has awakened an issue that has been festering for some time, the notion that ‘My life” does not matter.  Clearly, the unjustified killing of black men and others at the hands of law enforcement is tragic. Most recently, black men have seen their share of deaths and abuse increase (according to media reports) at the hands of police officers who, by the way, happen to be black and white. But this fact (black & white police officers) is not highlighted in news reports or media outlets.  You only hear about white police officers killing blacks. You should ask yourself why? Why do you only hear about white officers killing black men.  I asked myself, why is this happening? Why are officers killing black and white men?  I’m always pulled back to my statement that, as a nation “we do not value human life”. This is evidenced in the high abortion rates in this country of black babies, whose blood is running through the land. It’s also evidenced by a disregard for the elderly, from all races. When seniors become too burdensome, we move them from our homes to facilities to let them die. Or we stop all medical treatments that would keep them alive because it’s more “cost effective” to let them die. This underscores my statement that “we don’t value human life”. I make the connections here on two unrelated issues to highlight a point of our social psychology, that life is disposable. Just like razor blades and toothbrushes.

We have become accustomed to human life being expendable. Our comfort level as a society with death has seeped into police departments across the country and black men and white men have seen the brunt of it. Make no mistake, this disregard for human life is in many other areas. Take urban cities where black men kill other black men in massive numbers, and whites killing whites as well.  There’s an abundance of data on my statements, compiled by the FBI.  Unfortunately, this information is not shared with the public via media outlets because those in power want us divided, not united. The purpose of promoting dissent and division is to keep those who are pulling the strings behind the curtain in power. They will sacrifice our lives, via riots, protesting, racial divisions, stay at home orders and the shuddering of businesses to accomplish their goal, which is total power and control over the masses.

The current atmosphere of civil disobedience, protesting and rioting has furthered the divide in our country.  Some support it, some don’t.  I do support peaceful protesting and civil disobedience. But do not support rioting, looting, vandalism, attacking the innocent or stealing from businesses. Those who support the radical approach of rioting to have black voices heard are directing their anger in the wrong places.

If the argument holds true, that black men are unjustly targeted by law enforcement, and the power structures in those departments, i.e. police chiefs are installed by the “mayors” of those cities, why don’t black men and rioters direct their anger at city hall?   Why don’t they direct their looting and rioting exclusively to city properties and city owned vehicles? Why not attack police departments across the U.S.?  Those are the political structures that have direct control over policing. Why don’t they attack their oppressors?

Why burn, steal and vandalize private businesses, that are owned by blacks?  Why attack business like Target and Walmart? They’re not responsible for the killing of blacks by police.

Many who are rioting and stealing don’t really have a dog in the fight, but are opportunist who want to steal merchandise. How does stealing a flat screen TV support the cause and raise awareness of black deaths at the hands of police? It doesn’t.

We live in a constitutional republic. This means the constitution and the laws that are drawn from it are applicable to all citizens. We all have rights. If you have a cause for concern on social policies, rules, laws, government regulations, there’s a mechanism for your voice to be heard. You can call, write or visit legislators. You can protest outside of city offices. You can write articles and do posts on social media. You can also run for office. You have options.

Many have protested the stay at home orders and the closing of businesses. These protests have been peaceful., overall. Some have descended on city government buildings and legislatures to have their voices heard. Social media posts and articles have been written against the orders. This has moved some states to re-open quicker, for others it did not. In those states that have not acquiesced to the will of the people, the protesters have not rioted, looted or damaged property. Even when their livelihoods were at stake. These protesters had money taken directly of out their pockets, as many were business owners or employees who were not getting paid due to the shuttering of businesses. Whereas, others who protested against police brutality were not directly impacted and they rioted. Although, this statement is accurate, that does not minimize their right to protest, but they should do so within the confines of the law.

Protesters march down Lane Street during the ReOpen NC protest in downtown Raleigh, N.C. Tuesday, April 21, 2020.

I’ve had conversations with people who believe breaking laws and hurting others is a way to accomplish the greater good. So if a few business need to disappear, or some innocent people get hurt in the process, and it promotes change, it’s all good.  I don’t agree with that philosophy.

I often go to the bible for insight inspiration and direction. The bible serves as a foundation for our laws in many ways, i.e.Thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not murder. You get the point. The bible allows for the breaking of man-made decrees and laws if they contradict scripture. I’m not advocating that anyone do that. But it’s a point that I want to make.

There are quite a few instances in the Old and New Testament, whereby God allowed people to disregard man-made decrees or laws that forced them to violate God’s word. These instances were mostly associated with decrees ordering people to murder someone, giving up someone to authorities knowing they would be killed, or worshiping idols. In these examples, when the orders from emperors, kings or governors, involved taking another human life or worshiping idols, God gave them a pass when they “broke” the law. If laws in a particular state are passed that require you to perform some act that is contrary to the bible, based on historical precedent, I believe you can get a biblical pass. This does not mean there will not be local repercussions. But before God and scripture, this is what I’m referring too.

Look at these scriptures for some guidance

Joshua 2: Story of Rahab who was ordered to produce the spy by the king who would have killed the spy.

Exodus 1: Story of the Egyptian Pharaoh who orders all Hebrew midwives to kill all the 1st born male Hebrew children.

1 Samuel: Records a command given by King Saul that no eating was to happen until he won the fight with the philistines. His son ate and was hidden so he would not be killed.

Book of Daniel: Records a number of civil disobedience examples. The first is found with Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego who were told to worship idols and they refused and God protected them.

Historically, change has come through protesting and uprisings. We need to be mindful that the rights of the innocent are just as important as the rights of those affected by the unjust actions of a few. If you’re attacked and robbed, that does not give you the authority to do the same to someone else.

This from Coleman Hughes, highlights some of my thoughts on how we move forward at this critical juncture in our history. In my opinion the word of God, the rule of law and the constitution need to be our guide.

“The only way out of this conundrum, it seems to me, is for millions of Americans on the left to realize that deadly police shootings happen to blacks and whites alike. As long as critical masses of people view this as a race issue, they will see every new video of a black person being killed as yet another injustice in a long chain dating back to the Middle Passage. That sentiment, when it is felt deeply and earnestly, will reliably produce large protests and destructive riots”.

The political Right has a role to play as well. For too long, “All Lives Matter” has been a slogan used only as a response to Black Lives Matter. What it should have been, and still could be, is a true movement to reduce the number of Americans shot by the police on a race-neutral basis. If the challenge for the Left is to accept that the real problem with the police is not racism, the challenge for the Right is to accept that there are real problems with the police”.